就地权逻辑答周其仁教授
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Reply to Prefosser Zhou Qi- ren on Logic of Land Ownership
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    如何看待当前中国农村土地制度的合理性,有2种不同态度,笔者著作《地权的逻辑》在基本肯定当前中国农地制度和征地制度合理性的前提下,对当前学界和政策部门激进的土地制度改革思路进行了批评。针对《地权的逻辑》对现行土地制度的基本肯定立场,作为激进土地制度改革思路代表人物的周其仁教授提出了反批评。本文是对周其仁教授反批评的回应。回应主要集中在农民土地权利悖论、农村征地制度合理性、建设用地价值来源和社会科学研究方法等方面。

    Abstract:

    There are two different attitudes towards the reasonableness of current land system in China.The author’s book Logic of Land Ownership basically affirms the reasonableness of current rural land system and land requisition system,but this book also criticizes the thought of radical land system reform by academic circles and policy- making deparments.Logic of Land Ownership holds a positive attitudes towards the present land system,while professor Zhou Qiren,the representative figure of radical land system reform proposes his counter- criticism.This paper is the response to professor Zhou’s counter- criticism.Such repsonse mainly focuses on paradox of farmer’s land rights,reasonableness of rural land requisition system,value of construction land and methodology of social sciences.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贺雪峰.就地权逻辑答周其仁教授[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(3):1-9

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: