The elimination of the weak village of collective economy is a topic worthy of in-depth exploration.Through comparative case studies，it is found that the industrial organizational forms involved in this process represent a continuum from market trading to enterprise integration.Within this continuum，the leading market system can be classified as either loose or tight，which arises from different linkages constructed among government，enterprises，and society.A macro environment characterized by strong incentive of time pressure，along with an adaptive meso environment，are necessary conditions for constructing leading market systems.Meanwhile，the nature of the industry （old or new），the relationship between，labor and technology，and the relationship between labor and norms are sufficient and necessary conditions shaping whether the leading market system is loose or tight.Besides，the expansion of existing industries，the intergration of labor and technology，and production norms shape a loose leading market system，where government，enterprises and society form tangent relationships.On the other hand，the separation of new industries，labor and technology，and production norms shape a tight leading market，where government，enterprises and society construct intersecting relationships.Both loose or tight leading market systems highlight the importance of the government’s structural hole position and the effect of absorbing the participation of farmers，representing a multi-actor collective approach to “eliminating the weak”.Different leading market systems feature differentiated rule systems，industrial chain endpoints and operating mechanisms.In conclusion，the construction of leading market systems fosters multi-subject cooperation and interaction，as well as the complementary embedding of various mechanisms.Therefore，in the process of elimination，it is essential not only to build a leading market system，but also tailor approaches to local conditions.