百家争鸣与文艺复兴的历史比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A Historical Comparison between “A Hundred Schools of Thoughts Contending” and the Renaissance
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来,学术界一直在进行一场关于“中国有没有文艺复兴”的讨论。从文化发生学来看,在中国的百家争鸣与西方的文艺复兴各自的历史时期之前,中西方社会都是一种封建领主制社会。另外,从社会变迁与转型来看,两者所处的历史时期都经历了一次重大的社会变革,经历着由一种社会形态过渡到另一种新的社会形态的转型。而且在社会转型时期所承担的历史任务:发现新的人、新社会是相同的。而另一方面,中西方社会有历史的共性也有各自的个性,因而转型的结果会各不相同。基于此,从社会基础、历史趋势以及历史的使命三个层面,对百家争鸣与文艺复兴进行历史比较。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, a lot of scholars have been engaged in a debate concerning whether “China has Renaissance or not.” From the cultural genetic perspective, both China and Europe were in a period of feudal lord society before the period of A Hundred Schools of Thoughts Contending and Renaissance respectively.In addition, from the perspective of social change and transformation, both of the historical periods underwent a great social change, transforming from one social formation to a new one, and both undertook the historical tasks during a period of social transformation:the discovery of new people and new society.On the other hand, the history of China and that of Europe have their own unique features although they share some similarities, and thus the results of the transformation are different.This paper makes a comparison between the period of A Hundred Schools of Thoughts Contending in China and the Renaissance in Europe from three levels:the social foundation, the historical trends and the historical missions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李 静,萧洪恩.百家争鸣与文艺复兴的历史比较[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009(6):122-128

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: