Land conflict is a major challenge faced by the countries around the world in the transitional process.However,in different countries,the forms of land conflicts are quite different.Through the study of foreign land conflicts,this paper finds that the developed countries have manifested the forced exploitation of the poor peasants and the aborigines in the land ownership reform in the early stage of industrialization.After it becomes mature and stable,the developed countries showed the tension and geographical sharing of public and private interests in land development.Asian and African countries have manifested the resistance from landless peasants in the land conflict in the post-colonial era under land rights monopoly pattern and the capital and power infringement on small farmers in the process of land rights transfer.Under the background of different development experiences,foreign land conflict governance has produced the value orientation of “marketism” and “nationalism”,but more and more scholars realize that the factors of land conflict are diverse,and “statemarket” dual land reform path is usually ineffective.China’s rural land conflicts and foreign land conflicts are both similar and different,so China should try hard to be out of the reform of land “statemarket” dual dilemma.