稻-鸭-虾综合种养模式与其他稻田种养模式效率比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华中农业大学经济管理学院,武汉 430070;2.华中农业大学双水双绿研究院,武汉 430070

作者简介:

梁盼,E-mail:panliang@webmail.hzau.edu.cn

通讯作者:

陈轩,E-mail:xuan.chen@mail.hzau.edu.cn

中图分类号:

F326.4

基金项目:

湖北省哲学社会科学重大项目(23ZD115); 湖北洪山实验室重大项目(2021hszd002); 湖北省软科学面上项目(2024EDA107); 华中农业大学经济管理学院交叉研究项目培育专项(2023JGJC04); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2023JGLW06)


A comparative study of rice-duck-crayfish integrated farming system and other rice paddy farming systems
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Economics and Management,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China;2.Shuangshui Shuanglü Institute,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究不同稻田种养模式的效率差异及影响因素,基于2023年湖北省的实地调研数据,构建“效率评价-影响因素”框架,采用微观农户调研数据与气候数据相结合的方法,通过SFA和SBM-DEA模型对不同稻田种养模式的技术效率和生态效率分别进行测算,并比较其效率差异,探讨不同模式的优劣。研究结果显示:(1)在水稻单作、稻-虾、稻-鸭和稻-鸭-虾4种稻田种养模式中,稻-鸭-虾模式的技术效率和生态效率均表现突出,分别为0.760和0.545;而稻-鸭模式的技术效率及稻-虾模式的生态效率最低,分别为0.581和0.323。(2)户主性别、农业保险、经济发展水平、极端气温以及平均降雨量等因素抑制了技术效率的提升,而户主年龄、农业补贴、家庭总收入和无人机使用则促进技术效率的提高。(3)户主年龄和高温热浪指标显著提高了生态效率;而户主性别、家庭总人口数、家庭总收入、无人机使用情况、经济发展水平、极端低温和干旱等因素则抑制了生态效率的提升。(4)相比水稻单作模式,稻-虾模式的技术效率和生态效率显著降低0.053和0.178;而稻-鸭-虾模式的技术效率比水稻单作模式高0.163。研究表明,稻-鸭-虾模式在技术效率和生态效率方面均表现最佳,具有较高的推广潜力。

    Abstract:

    To explore the differences in efficiency and influencing factors among various rice field farming models,this study constructs an “efficiency assessment-influencing factors” framework based on field survey data collected from Hubei Province in 2023. By integrating micro-level household survey data with climate data,we employ both SFA and SBM-DEA models to measure the technical efficiency and ecological efficiency of different rice field farming systems. We systematically examine the efficiency disparities between these models and evaluate their respective advantages and limitations. The results indicate that: (1) Among the four rice-farming modes including single rice,rice-crayfish,rice-duck,and rice-duck-crayfish,the rice-duck-crayfish mode demonstrates the highest technical and ecological efficiency,with values of 0.760 and 0.545,respectively. In contrast,the technical efficiency of the rice-duck model and the ecological efficiency of the rice-crayfish model are the lowest,at 0.581 and 0.323,respectively. (2) Factors such as the gender of the household head,agricultural insurance,economic development level,extreme temperatures,and average rainfall have inhibited the improvement of technical efficiency,while the age of the household head,agricultural subsidies,total household income,and drone usage positively contribute to technical efficiency. (3) The age of the household head and indicators of high-temperature heatwaves significantly improve ecological efficiency,while factors such as the gender of the household head,total household population,total household income,drone usage,level of economic development,extreme low temperatures,and drought negatively affect the improvement of ecological efficiency. (4) Compared to the single rice mode,the rice-crayfish mode exhibits significant decrease in technical efficiency and ecological efficiency by 0.053 and 0.178,respectively. However,technical efficiency of the rice-duck-crayfish mode is 0.163 higher than that of the single rice mode. The study indicates that the rice-duck-crayfish model demonstrates the highest performance in terms of both technical and ecological efficiency,highlighting its substantial potential for promotion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

梁盼,陈轩,施龙中,李荣强.稻-鸭-虾综合种养模式与其他稻田种养模式效率比较[J].华中农业大学学报,2025,44(3):26-37

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-19
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码