Page 93 - 《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期
P. 93

88                             华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)                                 (总161 期)


                [30] 张信东,郝盼盼 .企业创新投入的原动力:CEO个人品质还是早年经历——基于 CEO过度自信品质与早年饥荒经历的对比[J].
                    上海财经大学学报,2017,19(1):61-74.
                [31] 郑旭媛,王芳,应瑞瑶 . 农户禀赋约束、技术属性与农业技术选择偏向——基于不完全要素市场条件下的农户技术采用分析框
                    架[J].中国农村经济,2018(3):105-122.
                [32] 刘生龙.教育对老年健康的影响:来自断点回归模型的实证证据[J].学术研究,2017(11):88-100,178.
                [33] 薛建平,盛玮,张爱民,等 .加强食物营养科普知识普及,改善学生健康状况[C]//安徽省科学技术协会 .安徽首届科普产业博士
                    科技论坛——暨社区科技传播体系与平台建构学术交流会论文集.合肥:安徽省科学技术协会学会部,2012:4.
                [34] LI F N,ZHANG J B,MA C B.Does family life cycle influence farm households’adoption decisions concerning sustainable agricul⁃
                    tural technology?[J].Journal of applied economics,2022,25(1):121-144.
                [35] 游宇,黄一凡,庄玉乙.自然灾害与政治信任:基于汶川大地震的自然实验设计[J].社会,2018,38(5):158-181.
                [36] NICHOLLS K,PICOU J S.The impact of hurricane Katrina on trust in government[J].Social science quarterly,2013,94(2):344-
                    361.
                [37] 楚汉.中国1959-1961——三年自然灾害长篇纪实[M].四川:四川人民出版社,1996.
                [38] 国家统计局国民经济综合统计司.新中国六十年统计资料汇编[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
                [39] 王营,曹廷求.CEO早年大饥荒经历影响企业慈善捐赠吗?[J].世界经济文汇,2017(6):16-38.
                [40] 程令国,张晔 .早年的饥荒经历影响了人们的储蓄行为吗?——对我国居民高储蓄率的一个新解释[J].经济研究,2011,46(8):
                    119-132.
                [41] FEDER G,MURGAI R R,QUIZON J B.The acquisition and diffusion of knowledge:the case of pest management training in farm⁃
                    er field schools,Indonesia[J].Journal of agricultural economics,2004,55(2):221-243.
                [42] 叶奕乾,孔克勤,杨秀君.个性心理学[M].3版.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011.


                      The Impact of Great Famine Experience on Farmers Green Pro⁃

                          duction Technology Selection Choice:Positive or Negative?



                                                 LI Fenni,ZHANG Junbiao
                    Abstract  Based on imprinting theory and survey data from 1058 households in Hubei Province,

                this paper analyzes the impact of great famine experience on farmers green production technology selec⁃
                tion choice. It is found that Great famine experience has a negative effect on farmers green production
                technology selection choice. There are heterogeneous effects of great famine experience on farmers green
                production technology selection choice. Compared to men,famine experience has a greater negative im⁃
                pact on women. It has inhibitory effect on the selection of risk-increasing and knowledge-intensive tech⁃
                nologies,such as improved seed and integrated pest management technology. However,it plays a pro⁃
                moting role in the selection of risk-mitigating and non-knowledge-intensive technologies,such as com⁃
                prehensive utilization of livestock manure. The impact of great famine experience materializes through
                farmers’risk aversion,human capital accumulation and social trust level and varies among farmers who
                experience the famine at different stages. Therefore,suggestions are put forward in term of mitigating
                farmers’risk aversion,strengthening human capital,and increasing the level of social trust.
                    Key words    great famine experience;imprinting theory;green production;technology selection;

                multivariate probit model

                                                                                         (责任编辑:陈万红)
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98