Page 72 - 《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第5期
P. 72

第5 期                 杨   华 等:沟通式动员:县域上下级政府间政策协商机制及其功能                                  67


                  [28] 周黎安,刘冲,厉行,等.“层层加码”与官员激励[J].世界经济文汇,2015(1):1-15.
                  [29] 贺雪峰.行政体制中的责权利层级不对称问题[J].云南行政学院学报,2015(4):5-7.
                  [30] 周张翔,陈婧 .压力型体制的“减压阀”效应:一个有组织的政策企业家行动——基于对 2019年 A省伏季休渔期政策执行过程的
                      观察[J].天津行政学院学报,2021(4):31-43.
                  [31] 周雪光.中国国家治理的制度逻辑:一个组织学研究[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2017.
                  [32] 赵志远.政府职责体系构建中的权责清单制度:结构、过程与机制[J].政治学研究,2021(5):89-98,158.
                  [33] 黄栋.国家治理现代化中的政策协同创新[J].求索,2021(5):160-169.


                       Communicative Mobilization:the Negotiation Between Higher and

                                      Lower Levels of Grass-roots Governments



                                                  YANG Hua,ZHANG Dandan

                       Abstract  The“incremental pressure on grass-roots governments”in the implementation of public

                  policies has led to practical difficulties such as policy adaptations and system imbalances. However,the
                  space for“incremental pressure”at the higher level is also the space for“bargaining”at the lower level.
                  There is a communication type policy mobilization between the upper and lower levels. Taking the gover⁃
                  nance practice of C County as an example,this paper constructs the analytical framework of“external
                  pressure⁃internal consensus”,analyzes the communication mechanism between the superior and subordi⁃
                  nate governments in the negotiation process,and discusses the executive consensus of the superior and
                  subordinate collaborative governance. The study found that communicative mobilization,such as objec⁃
                  tive attribution,organizational coordination,institutional feedback and differentiated incentive,has built
                  policy implementation units comprising joint responsibilities among hierarchies,internalization of main
                  responsibilities and consensus of collective action between the upper and lower levels and the upper and
                  lower policy subjects reach an implementation consensus around the common policy objectives resulting
                  in the regularization of campaign-style governance,limited mobilization of non accountability system and
                  independent space for local implementation. Communicative mobilization,as a buffer mechanism for
                  pressure transmission,has changed the policy implementation path and realized the self-adjustment and
                  institutional resilience of the pressure system.
                       Key words  grass-root governments;the negotiation between higher and lower levels;policy com⁃

                  munication;negotiation space;institutional resilience

                                                                                          (责任编辑:金会平)
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77